Request a Call Back

Best strategies for sustaining gains after a Six Sigma project enters the Control phase?


We’ve seen many projects at our firm revert to old habits within six months of the Black Belt signing off. What are the most robust Control Plan strategies beyond just using a basic SPC chart? How do we ensure that the process owners actually take responsibility for the new standards and don't let the performance drift back to the baseline?


   2024-01-15 in Quality Management by Jennifer Lewis | 12586 Views


All answers to this question.


Sustaining gains is 20% tools and 80% culture. While Statistical Process Control (SPC) is necessary, you should implement "Poka-Yoke" (error-proofing) wherever possible. If the new process is physically or digitally designed so that it’s impossible to do it the "old way," you don’t have to worry about drift. In late 2023, we added mandatory fields in our ERP system that matched the new Six Sigma workflow. The users literally couldn't revert. Additionally, you must integrate the project KPIs into the process owner's annual performance review. If their bonus depends on the Six Sigma metrics, they will find a way to maintain them.

   Answered 2024-01-18 by Margaret Fisher


Have you considered a "Reaction Plan" as part of your Control document? Most people have a chart but don't know what to do when a point goes out of control. Does your current documentation clearly define who is contacted and what immediate action is taken when a "special cause" variation is detected on your control charts?

   Answered 2024-01-20 by Richard Moore

  • Richard, we actually lack a formal Reaction Plan. We have the charts, but the operators usually just ignore the red dots or "wait and see." Based on your question, I’m going to create a tiered response matrix: Tier 1 is operator adjustment, Tier 2 is supervisor notification, and Tier 3 is an engineering hold. This should provide the clear "what now" that our current Control phase is missing.

       Commented 2024-01-22 by Jennifer Lewis


Use "Audit Layers." Have the manager check the process once a week, and the director check once a month. This visual management keeps everyone's attention focused on the new standard.

   Answered 2024-01-23 by Sarah Jenkins

  • Auditing is key. I’ve seen the "Layered Process Audit" (LPA) work wonders in manufacturing. It keeps the accountability moving up the chain, exactly as Sarah suggested.

       Commented 2024-01-24 by Margaret Fisher



Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (*)




Suggested Questions

Introduction to Project Management..
Posted 2026-07-07 by learnersera.
Balancing Link Metrics With Structural Entity Maps..
Posted 2025-05-12 by learnersera.
Balancing Link Metrics With Structural Entity Maps..
Posted 2025-05-12 by learnersera.
Impact of Entity Authority on Organic Competitive..
Posted 2025-01-04 by learnersera.
Backlinks vs Entity Authority for SEO Rankings..
Posted 2025-04-14 by learnersera.
How are modern agile organizations evaluating scrum..
Posted 2025-07-19 by learnersera.
Is a specialized technical degree required to..
Posted 2025-10-05 by learnersera.
How heavily do hiring managers weigh professional..
Posted 2025-09-12 by learnersera.

Disclaimer

  • "PMI®", "PMBOK®", "PMP®", "CAPM®" and "PMI-ACP®" are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.
  • "CSM", "CST" are Registered Trade Marks of The Scrum Alliance, USA.
  • COBIT® is a trademark of ISACA® registered in the United States and other countries.
  • CBAP® and IIBA® are registered trademarks of International Institute of Business Analysis™.

We Accept

We Accept

Follow Us

 facebook icon
 twitter
linkedin

Instagram
twitter
Youtube

Quick Enquiry Form

WhatsApp Us  /      +1 (713)-287-1187