Can RAG handle multi-modal data like images and tables for higher response accuracy?
Most discussions about RAG (Concept) focus on text. Can this method be used to make LLMs accurate when the answer lies inside a complex chart or an image within a PDF? Or is there a different framework we should use for multi-modal accuracy?
2025-01-10 in AI and Deep Learning by Brandon Taylor
| 11220 Views
All answers to this question.
Multi-modal RAG (Concept) is the new frontier. To make it work, you need to use a vision-language model to describe the images or extract the tables into a structured format like Markdown during the ingestion phase. Once the images are converted into text descriptions or structured tables, they can be indexed just like any other document. When a user asks a question, the system retrieves the relevant table or image description, allowing the LLM to provide an accurate answer based on visual data it wouldn't otherwise be able to "see" in a standard text-only pipeline.
Answered 2025-01-11 by Angela Myers
If the data is primarily in complex tables, wouldn't a "Text-to-SQL" approach be more accurate than using a standard RAG (Concept) vector search?
Answered 2025-01-12 by Scott Peterson
-
Great point, Scott. If your data is structured, Text-to-SQL is often more precise. However, most enterprise data is semi-structured. A hybrid approach where RAG (Concept) handles the messy text and a specialized table parser handles the rows and columns usually yields the highest overall accuracy for diverse document sets.
Commented 2025-01-13 by Larry Hudson
We use OCR to convert images to text before indexing. It makes RAG (Concept) work surprisingly well for scanned historical documents and invoices.
Answered 2025-01-14 by Cynthia Fox
-
I’ve seen that too, Cynthia. High-quality OCR is the unsung hero of making RAG (Concept) effective for legacy industries moving to the cloud.
Commented 2025-01-15 by Angela Myers
Write a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (*)

